14 THINGS THAT ARE Outdated IN 21ST CENTURY SCHOOLS

Saying that it has forever been like this, doesn't consider a real legitimization to why it ought to remain as such. Educator and executives all around the world are doing astonishing things, however a portion of the things we are as yet doing, notwithstanding every one of the new arrangements, exploration and thoughts out there is, to say the least, staggering.

I'm not saying we ought to simply improve the ongoing framework… we ought to transform it into something different.

I have ordered a rundown of 14 things that are outdated in 21st century schools and it is my expectation that this will rouse exuberant conversations about the fate of training.

1. PC Rooms

Taking an entire class to a PC room with obsolete gear, when seven days to rehearse their typing abilities and sending them back to the study hall 40 minutes after the fact, is outdated.

PCs or innovation shouldn't simply be a particular subject, that is not adequate any longer yet rather it ought to be an essential piece of the relative multitude of subjects and incorporated into the educational plan.

2. Segregated study halls

Homerooms can be secluded in two ways. One where guardians, educators or visitors are not wanted in light of the fact that the entryway and window hangings are constantly closed… which has the words "Don't come in here" composed on top of it. The alternate way is being segregated to all the information outside the 4 walls. For instance from the web, recordings, online journals, sites and visits from creators or researchers through Skype, to give some examples.

Tony Wagner, the creator of the Worldwide Accomplishment Hole says: "Detachment is the foe of progress". The study hall ought to be open, educators ought to have the option to stroll in and gain from one another, guardians ought to visit frequently, f.x. with supposed Additional Open Schooldays (where all guardians are urged to visit homerooms whenever during the day). Confined study halls are subsequently outdated.

3. Schools that don't have WiFi

Schools that don't have a vigorous WiFi network for staff and understudies are not just missing a major change for educating and advancing however denying the understudies of admittance to information and furthermore restricting their opportunities to find out about the web and involving innovation in a protected manner.

21st century schools make it workable for understudies and staff to advance anyplace, whenever and schools that don't permit that are out of date.

4. Forbidding telephones and tablets

Taking telephones and tablets from understudies as opposed to utilizing them to upgrade learning is outdated. We ought to praise the innovation understudies bring and involve them as learning instruments.

Telephones are presently not only gadgets to message and settle on telephone decisions… when they were, then, at that point, forbidding them was alright. Today there is really handling power in the normal cell phone than NASA approached when they sent a man to the moon in 1969. However most understudies just skill to involve these gadgets for web-based entertainment and messing around.

Today you can alter a film, make a public broadcast, take pictures, make banners, sites, blog, tweet as a person from a book, have class discussions over TodaysMeet and Google most responses on a test with the gadget in your pocket. We ought to show our understudies the learning prospects and transform these interruptions into learning valuable open doors that will arrive at far external the study hall.

5. Tech chief with a head access

Having one individual liable for the PC framework, working from an austere office in the school storm cellar, encompassed by old PCs, refreshes the projects and lets the staff know what tech devices they can and can't utilize… is old.

Today we want innovation co-ordinators that understand what instructors and understudies should find lasting success and takes care of issues as opposed to making hindrances. Somebody who assists individuals with aiding themselves by giving them obligation and tracks down better and less expensive ways of getting things done.

6. Instructors that don't share what they do

Instructors who work quietly, don't tweet, blog and examine thoughts with individuals all over the planet are old. Instructors are done working locally however around the world and we must share what we do and see what others are doing. On the off chance that an educator is done learning, he ought not be showing others.

It would be ideal for we to all be tweeting, writing for a blog and sharing what works and doesn't work, get and offer guidance to and from collaborators all over the planet. We ought to continually be further developing our specialty since proficient improvement is definitely not a 3 hour studio once a month however a deep rooted process.

7. Schools that don't have Facebook or Twitter

Schools that think putting a news story on the school site each and every other week and distribute a month to month bulletin is sufficient to keep guardians informed are out of date.

The school ought to have a Facebook page, share news and data with guardians, have a Twitter account and their own hashtag, run their own web-based Television station where understudies film, alter and distribute things about school occasions.

8. Undesirable cafeteria food

School cafeterias that look and work practically like drive-through joints where staff and understudies get a modest, quick and unfortunate feasts are outdated.

A couple of schools in Iceland and Sweden have turned totally to natural food varieties and given thought into the drawn out advantage of good food as opposed to the momentary reserve funds of the undesirable. For instance at Stora Hammar school in Sweden 90% of the food served is natural.

Youngsters ought to put the food on their own plate, tidy up after themselves and even do the dishes. Not on the grounds that it gets a good deal on labor force but since it is a piece of growing up and finding out about liability. What 21st century schools ought to do also is developing their own leafy foods where understudies water them and find out about nature. Setting up a homestead to take care of understudies would be ideal, yet on the off chance that that isn't a possibility (for instance in huge city schools) then they can finally set up a windowfarm in a portion of the school windows.

The objective with giving understudies a quality dinner isn't just to give them enough sustenance to last the school day yet to make good food a typical piece of their regular routine and inspire them to ponder nourishment which is something that will help them until the end of their lives.

9. Beginning school at 8 o'clock for teens

Research has displayed again and again that youngsters improve and feel improved in schools that start later. Frequently guardians or managers needs impede that change. Research (f.x. from The Diary of Formative and Conduct Pediatrics and College of Minnesota - video) show that postponing school start just 50 minutes and making it longer by 30 minutes rather has a constructive outcome both on learning and exercises after school. Schools that don't do this are outdated.

Beginning later is simple and educators could involve the additional opportunity in the first part of the day to get ready class… it's a mutually beneficial arrangement.

10. Purchasing banner , site and flyer plan for the school

At the point when your school needs a banner, handout or another site they shouldn't buy the help from elsewhere (albeit that can some of the time be the situation) and have understudies do it all things considered. In the best schools representing things to come, they will be the ones doing it as a genuine task that has meaning and as a cooperative venture in language and craftsmanship… .utilizing innovation.

11. Customary libraries

Libraries that just hold back books and chess tables are old.

A 21st century library ought to be at the core of the school and where the two understudies and staff can come in to unwind, read, get counsel, access strong gadgets, alter recordings, music, print in 3D and figure out how to code to give some examples. This 21st century learning space ought to allow individuals an equivalent opportunity to utilize these gadgets and access data. Generally these libraries will transform into exhibition halls where individuals go to take a gander at everything we used to utilize.

12. All understudies get something very similar

Placing kids in a similar class since they are brought into the world around the same time is old. Educational systems were initially gotten up in a position address the issues of industrialism. In those days we really wanted individuals to work in plants, similarity was great and no one was intended to succeed or be different in that climate. That doesn't meet our requirements today, not to mention the future yet many schools are as yet set up like the processing plants they were intended to serve a long time back.

We ought to increment decision, give youngsters backing to thrive in what intrigues them and not just focus on them in the things they're awful at. In many schools, assuming that you are great in workmanship however awful in german you get german examples to get to standard with different understudies as opposed to succeeding at craftsmanship… All even, no different either way!

Schooling ought to be individualized, understudies ought to work in bunches paying little mind to mature and their schooling ought to be worked around their necessities.

13. One-Proficient improvement studio fits-all

A school that simply sends the whole staff to a studio once per month where everybody get the equivalent are old. Proficient advancement is generally top down rather than the ground up where everybody get what they need and need. This is on the grounds that giving everybody (counting understudies) what they need and need takes time and cash.

With things like Twitter, Pinterest, articles on the web, books, recordings, co-activity and discussions workers can customize their expert turn of events. (Find out about my article on Customized Proficient Improvement here)

14. Government sanctioned tests to gauge the nature of schooling

Taking a gander at state sanctioned tests to assess whether youngsters are taught or not is the most moronic thing we can do and provides us with a shallow perspective on learning. The results, albeit decently significant, measure just a little piece of what we maintain that our children should learn and by zeroing in on these tests we are limiting the educational program. Alfie Kohn even brought up a measurably critical relationship between's high grades on state sanctioned tests and a shallow way to deal with learning.

This present reality and the requirements of the general public are totally unique to what they used to be. We are preparing individuals to work locally as well as all around the world. With government sanctioned test, similar to PISA, we are limiting the educational program, and all the OECD nations are showing exactly the same thing. As a result of that we as a whole produce similar sort of laborers, obsolete specialists, to work in processing plants. Individuals who can agree, act and resemble everyone else.In the worldwide present reality it is not difficult to re-appropriate positions to somebody who will do a similar work, similarly as quick for less cash. Along these lines we want innovative individuals that can accomplish something different and think in an unexpected way.

Normalized instruction could have been the response once yet saying that it's old is understating the obvious and is just a method for attempting to fix the wrecked framework. Consequences of those tests are, as per Daniel Pink (An Entirely different Psyche, 2005) in direct inconsistency to the abilities we really want today. Those abilities are for instance plan, story, ensemble, compassion, play, and importance.

We ought to tackle genuine issues, posing inquiries that matter as opposed to recollecting and rehashing realities. Grown-ups' achievements are connected undeniably more emphatically to their innovativeness than level of intelligence (source) and we ought to celebrate different information and interest as opposed to attempting to normalize information and abilities.

I keep thinking about whether schools would at last shift their course in the event that we planned a new normalize test that wouldn't quantify numeracy, science and proficiency however compassion, imaginative reasoning and relational abilities… Perhaps that is all we really want.

Last considerations

All the schooling systems in the world are being changed, however I don't think change is what we really want. We really want a transformation and change the school system into something different. It's anything but a simple undertaking, however as S.E. Phillips once said:

Anything worth having, merits battling for.

Experimenting and come by unfortunate outcomes on the old test shouldn't astound anybody. Why bother with experimenting and unique in the event that we obtain similar outcomes on state administered tests… we should simply do production line tutoring, adjust and consent.

"Assuming I had asked individuals what they needed, they would have said quicker ponies" - Henry Portage

That is precisely exact thing we are doing today. We are requesting that our understudies recall more, compose better and rehash quicker then previously… very much like we needed the quicker horse, when truly we ought to request the vehicle. Sure the vehicle wasn't superior to the pony at the outset and our school system won't be amazing by the same token. It won't ever be great, it ought to be continually developing and we ought to endeavor to improve it consistently.

I don't have any idea what an ideal schooling system resembles, and don't think it even exist. In any case, that's what I trust assuming we talk, take a stab at something else, bomb forward, examine and share what we do, locally as well as universally, we can draw a great deal nearer.